logo
Search
IN MEMORY OF  
   Forum Index ->
Click the image to Enter your Rating
First Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Last Page 
Author Message
 
Post Posted: 12 days ago 
0
 
0
Track Thumbs Up/Down
Reply with quote

13 days ago

I see someone is in here lying again.

Nancy Marshall: https://www.facebook.com/nancy.marshall.395?fref=pb&hc_location=profile_browser

Thomas Cook: https://www.facebook.com/thomas.cook.982845?fref=pb&hc_location=profile_browser

Garrett Marshall: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=12429587

Suzanne Marshall: https://www.facebook.com/suzannelettmarshall

Colleen Marshall: https://www.facebook.com/colleen.marshall.5209

Becky Lauer Duckworth: https://www.facebook.com/becky.lauerduckworth?fref=pb&hc_location=profile_browser

Samantha Hrdlicka: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100009378206159&fref=pb&hc_location=friends_tab

His friends know that's him in the pic.

Hey @wht_sks_blk !!!

Who is that in the last link? I want to use her pic as my default..Smile


_________________





 
Post Posted: 12 days ago 
0
 
0
Track Thumbs Up/Down
Reply with quote

13 days ago

I see someone is in here lying again.

Nancy Marshall: https://www.facebook.com/nancy.marshall.395?fref=pb&hc_location=profile_browser

Thomas Cook: https://www.facebook.com/thomas.cook.982845?fref=pb&hc_location=profile_browser

Garrett Marshall: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=12429587

Suzanne Marshall: https://www.facebook.com/suzannelettmarshall

Colleen Marshall: https://www.facebook.com/colleen.marshall.5209

Becky Lauer Duckworth: https://www.facebook.com/becky.lauerduckworth?fref=pb&hc_location=profile_browser

Samantha Hrdlicka: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100009378206159&fref=pb&hc_location=friends_tab

His friends know that's him in the pic.

12 days ago

LMAO

12 days ago

Do you realize that last FB link you just re-posted seems to be that of a little girl, maybe 8-9 years old?

Both you and "upnorthkidd" have now posted the contact information for a little girl on a Gay hook up site. I think "darthcocoa" did too.

Cops don't look kindly on such things, and neither does BGC, when they are forced to provide background information, or have their servers grabbed.

Just saying....

Smile

12 days ago

LOL...I quoted what that individual posted.

Another funny thing about white people, they always threatening THE LAW and RULES and REGULATIONS. Never follow them, but want to enforce them for everyone else. I basically told you 4 threads back, white people love authority, they love power and always making sure they get in the line of work to be Police officer, Military or any position that will give them the power to do what they want and tell others what to do. It`s playing out right here. I am sure those facebook pics are on many sites...thats why you need not post personal things on social sites, those are the chances one takes when they do such. I`m sure you know of some Officer, CIA Agent, Senator (all power positions) that can handle this dilemma. (Go call them).

12 days ago

No, you re-posted the Link he had originally posted.

Which is the same as posting it yourself.

Which, again, seems to be that of a little girl's FB page.

The facts are the facts.

I just brought it to your attention, don't blame me, I didn't do any of it.

I'm just astounded that anyone could be so stupid and careless.

SMDH...

12 days ago

There goes that white privilege again. Do you honestly think that you are the only one who has had their facebook page. Remember, if you don`t want it exposed, don`t put it on social media...now whose careless and stupid. You got your name posted, your face pic and giving out all your personal information just to get some dick and now it fell into the wrong hands. Why don`t you post your social security number stupid.

Again, I didn't post anything.

YOU posted a Link to the FB page of a little girl, by re-posting what another person posted.

The law says that disseminating something like that is equal to originating it.

No difference.

If you can't see the connection to posting a kid's info & FB page Link on a Gay Adult website, how that is illegal, then I can't help you.

You can keep with your "bravado" and bluster about this illegal act all you want, but it won't change the facts.

And I suspect you know the truth.

SMDH...
 
Post Posted: 12 days ago 
2
 
0
Track Thumbs Up/Down
Reply with quote

13 days ago

I see someone is in here lying again.

Nancy Marshall: https://www.facebook.com/nancy.marshall.395?fref=pb&hc_location=profile_browser

Thomas Cook: https://www.facebook.com/thomas.cook.982845?fref=pb&hc_location=profile_browser

Garrett Marshall: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=12429587

Suzanne Marshall: https://www.facebook.com/suzannelettmarshall

Colleen Marshall: https://www.facebook.com/colleen.marshall.5209

Becky Lauer Duckworth: https://www.facebook.com/becky.lauerduckworth?fref=pb&hc_location=profile_browser

Samantha Hrdlicka: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100009378206159&fref=pb&hc_location=friends_tab

His friends know that's him in the pic.

12 days ago

LMAO

12 days ago

Do you realize that last FB link you just re-posted seems to be that of a little girl, maybe 8-9 years old?

Both you and "upnorthkidd" have now posted the contact information for a little girl on a Gay hook up site. I think "darthcocoa" did too.

Cops don't look kindly on such things, and neither does BGC, when they are forced to provide background information, or have their servers grabbed.

Just saying....

Smile

12 days ago

LOL...I quoted what that individual posted.

Another funny thing about white people, they always threatening THE LAW and RULES and REGULATIONS. Never follow them, but want to enforce them for everyone else. I basically told you 4 threads back, white people love authority, they love power and always making sure they get in the line of work to be Police officer, Military or any position that will give them the power to do what they want and tell others what to do. It`s playing out right here. I am sure those facebook pics are on many sites...thats why you need not post personal things on social sites, those are the chances one takes when they do such. I`m sure you know of some Officer, CIA Agent, Senator (all power positions) that can handle this dilemma. (Go call them).

12 days ago

No, you re-posted the Link he had originally posted.

Which is the same as posting it yourself.

Which, again, seems to be that of a little girl's FB page.

The facts are the facts.

I just brought it to your attention, don't blame me, I didn't do any of it.

I'm just astounded that anyone could be so stupid and careless.

SMDH...

12 days ago

There goes that white privilege again. Do you honestly think that you are the only one who has had their facebook page. Remember, if you don`t want it exposed, don`t put it on social media...now whose careless and stupid. You got your name posted, your face pic and giving out all your personal information just to get some dick and now it fell into the wrong hands. Why don`t you post your social security number stupid.

12 days ago

Again, I didn't post anything.

YOU posted a Link to the FB page of a little girl, by re-posting what another person posted.

The law says that disseminating something like that is equal to originating it.

No difference.

If you can't see the connection to posting a kid's info & FB page Link on a Gay Adult website, how that is illegal, then I can't help you.

You can keep with your "bravado" and bluster about this illegal act all you want, but it won't change the facts.

And I suspect you know the truth.

SMDH...

Tom, oh white Tom, you are not my subordinate, you are not the lawyer, judge or jury. I could give two damns about what you are talking about - if it`s on social media it`s free for all. If you feel that strongly about it and about Joe Jackson, why don`t you call the law, otherwise Shut the fuck up, okay. You damn liar and fraud.
 
Post Posted: 12 days ago 
0
 
0
Track Thumbs Up/Down
Reply with quote

13 days ago

I see someone is in here lying again.

Nancy Marshall: https://www.facebook.com/nancy.marshall.395?fref=pb&hc_location=profile_browser

Thomas Cook: https://www.facebook.com/thomas.cook.982845?fref=pb&hc_location=profile_browser

Garrett Marshall: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=12429587

Suzanne Marshall: https://www.facebook.com/suzannelettmarshall

Colleen Marshall: https://www.facebook.com/colleen.marshall.5209

Becky Lauer Duckworth: https://www.facebook.com/becky.lauerduckworth?fref=pb&hc_location=profile_browser

Samantha Hrdlicka: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100009378206159&fref=pb&hc_location=friends_tab

His friends know that's him in the pic.

12 days ago

LMAO

12 days ago

Do you realize that last FB link you just re-posted seems to be that of a little girl, maybe 8-9 years old?

Both you and "upnorthkidd" have now posted the contact information for a little girl on a Gay hook up site. I think "darthcocoa" did too.

Cops don't look kindly on such things, and neither does BGC, when they are forced to provide background information, or have their servers grabbed.

Just saying....

Smile

12 days ago

LOL...I quoted what that individual posted.

Another funny thing about white people, they always threatening THE LAW and RULES and REGULATIONS. Never follow them, but want to enforce them for everyone else. I basically told you 4 threads back, white people love authority, they love power and always making sure they get in the line of work to be Police officer, Military or any position that will give them the power to do what they want and tell others what to do. It`s playing out right here. I am sure those facebook pics are on many sites...thats why you need not post personal things on social sites, those are the chances one takes when they do such. I`m sure you know of some Officer, CIA Agent, Senator (all power positions) that can handle this dilemma. (Go call them).

12 days ago

No, you re-posted the Link he had originally posted.

Which is the same as posting it yourself.

Which, again, seems to be that of a little girl's FB page.

The facts are the facts.

I just brought it to your attention, don't blame me, I didn't do any of it.

I'm just astounded that anyone could be so stupid and careless.

SMDH...

12 days ago

There goes that white privilege again. Do you honestly think that you are the only one who has had their facebook page. Remember, if you don`t want it exposed, don`t put it on social media...now whose careless and stupid. You got your name posted, your face pic and giving out all your personal information just to get some dick and now it fell into the wrong hands. Why don`t you post your social security number stupid.

12 days ago

Again, I didn't post anything.

YOU posted a Link to the FB page of a little girl, by re-posting what another person posted.

The law says that disseminating something like that is equal to originating it.

No difference.

If you can't see the connection to posting a kid's info & FB page Link on a Gay Adult website, how that is illegal, then I can't help you.

You can keep with your "bravado" and bluster about this illegal act all you want, but it won't change the facts.

And I suspect you know the truth.

SMDH...

12 days ago

Tom, oh white Tom, you are not my subordinate, you are not the lawyer, judge or jury. I could give two damns about what you are talking about - if it`s on social media it`s free for all. If you feel that strongly about it and about Joe Jackson, why don`t you call the law, otherwise Shut the fuck up, okay. You damn liar and fraud.

I want her to post the law that we are breaking. Laws are not word of mouth. They are legislated and documented. If we are breaking a law, "Uncle" Tom should post the law we are breaking right here in this thread..Smile
_________________

 
Post Posted: 12 days ago 
0
 
0
Track Thumbs Up/Down
Reply with quote

13 days ago

I see someone is in here lying again.

Nancy Marshall: https://www.facebook.com/nancy.marshall.395?fref=pb&hc_location=profile_browser

Thomas Cook: https://www.facebook.com/thomas.cook.982845?fref=pb&hc_location=profile_browser

Garrett Marshall: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=12429587

Suzanne Marshall: https://www.facebook.com/suzannelettmarshall

Colleen Marshall: https://www.facebook.com/colleen.marshall.5209

Becky Lauer Duckworth: https://www.facebook.com/becky.lauerduckworth?fref=pb&hc_location=profile_browser

Samantha Hrdlicka: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100009378206159&fref=pb&hc_location=friends_tab

His friends know that's him in the pic.

12 days ago

LMAO

12 days ago

Do you realize that last FB link you just re-posted seems to be that of a little girl, maybe 8-9 years old?

Both you and "upnorthkidd" have now posted the contact information for a little girl on a Gay hook up site. I think "darthcocoa" did too.

Cops don't look kindly on such things, and neither does BGC, when they are forced to provide background information, or have their servers grabbed.

Just saying....

Smile

12 days ago

LOL...I quoted what that individual posted.

Another funny thing about white people, they always threatening THE LAW and RULES and REGULATIONS. Never follow them, but want to enforce them for everyone else. I basically told you 4 threads back, white people love authority, they love power and always making sure they get in the line of work to be Police officer, Military or any position that will give them the power to do what they want and tell others what to do. It`s playing out right here. I am sure those facebook pics are on many sites...thats why you need not post personal things on social sites, those are the chances one takes when they do such. I`m sure you know of some Officer, CIA Agent, Senator (all power positions) that can handle this dilemma. (Go call them).

12 days ago

No, you re-posted the Link he had originally posted.

Which is the same as posting it yourself.

Which, again, seems to be that of a little girl's FB page.

The facts are the facts.

I just brought it to your attention, don't blame me, I didn't do any of it.

I'm just astounded that anyone could be so stupid and careless.

SMDH...

12 days ago

There goes that white privilege again. Do you honestly think that you are the only one who has had their facebook page. Remember, if you don`t want it exposed, don`t put it on social media...now whose careless and stupid. You got your name posted, your face pic and giving out all your personal information just to get some dick and now it fell into the wrong hands. Why don`t you post your social security number stupid.

12 days ago

Again, I didn't post anything.

YOU posted a Link to the FB page of a little girl, by re-posting what another person posted.

The law says that disseminating something like that is equal to originating it.

No difference.

If you can't see the connection to posting a kid's info & FB page Link on a Gay Adult website, how that is illegal, then I can't help you.

You can keep with your "bravado" and bluster about this illegal act all you want, but it won't change the facts.

And I suspect you know the truth.

SMDH...

12 days ago

Tom, oh white Tom, you are not my subordinate, you are not the lawyer, judge or jury. I could give two damns about what you are talking about - if it`s on social media it`s free for all. If you feel that strongly about it and about Joe Jackson, why don`t you call the law, otherwise Shut the fuck up, okay. You damn liar and fraud.

12 days ago

I want her to post the law that we are breaking. Laws are not word of mouth. They are legislated and documented. If we are breaking a law, "Uncle" Tom should post the law we are breaking right here in this thread..Smile

Ms. Tom is trying to evoke her white privilege by trying to throw her authoritative nature around...that`s what they do. I am quite sure she has so many pics of young underage black and white twinks loaded on her computer and phone. Not to mention her paying under aged boys for sex, she looks like the type and since she`s not attractive as she thought she was when she was younger and still posting those young aged pics of herself, Im sure she`s paying for sex by any means necessary. .

 
Post Posted: 12 days ago 
0
 
0
Track Thumbs Up/Down
Reply with quote

13 days ago

I see someone is in here lying again.

Nancy Marshall: https://www.facebook.com/nancy.marshall.395?fref=pb&hc_location=profile_browser

Thomas Cook: https://www.facebook.com/thomas.cook.982845?fref=pb&hc_location=profile_browser

Garrett Marshall: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=12429587

Suzanne Marshall: https://www.facebook.com/suzannelettmarshall

Colleen Marshall: https://www.facebook.com/colleen.marshall.5209

Becky Lauer Duckworth: https://www.facebook.com/becky.lauerduckworth?fref=pb&hc_location=profile_browser

Samantha Hrdlicka: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100009378206159&fref=pb&hc_location=friends_tab

His friends know that's him in the pic.

12 days ago

LMAO

12 days ago

Do you realize that last FB link you just re-posted seems to be that of a little girl, maybe 8-9 years old?

Both you and "upnorthkidd" have now posted the contact information for a little girl on a Gay hook up site. I think "darthcocoa" did too.

Cops don't look kindly on such things, and neither does BGC, when they are forced to provide background information, or have their servers grabbed.

Just saying....

Smile

12 days ago

LOL...I quoted what that individual posted.

Another funny thing about white people, they always threatening THE LAW and RULES and REGULATIONS. Never follow them, but want to enforce them for everyone else. I basically told you 4 threads back, white people love authority, they love power and always making sure they get in the line of work to be Police officer, Military or any position that will give them the power to do what they want and tell others what to do. It`s playing out right here. I am sure those facebook pics are on many sites...thats why you need not post personal things on social sites, those are the chances one takes when they do such. I`m sure you know of some Officer, CIA Agent, Senator (all power positions) that can handle this dilemma. (Go call them).

12 days ago

No, you re-posted the Link he had originally posted.

Which is the same as posting it yourself.

Which, again, seems to be that of a little girl's FB page.

The facts are the facts.

I just brought it to your attention, don't blame me, I didn't do any of it.

I'm just astounded that anyone could be so stupid and careless.

SMDH...

12 days ago

There goes that white privilege again. Do you honestly think that you are the only one who has had their facebook page. Remember, if you don`t want it exposed, don`t put it on social media...now whose careless and stupid. You got your name posted, your face pic and giving out all your personal information just to get some dick and now it fell into the wrong hands. Why don`t you post your social security number stupid.

12 days ago

Again, I didn't post anything.

YOU posted a Link to the FB page of a little girl, by re-posting what another person posted.

The law says that disseminating something like that is equal to originating it.

No difference.

If you can't see the connection to posting a kid's info & FB page Link on a Gay Adult website, how that is illegal, then I can't help you.

You can keep with your "bravado" and bluster about this illegal act all you want, but it won't change the facts.

And I suspect you know the truth.

SMDH...

12 days ago

Tom, oh white Tom, you are not my subordinate, you are not the lawyer, judge or jury. I could give two damns about what you are talking about - if it`s on social media it`s free for all. If you feel that strongly about it and about Joe Jackson, why don`t you call the law, otherwise Shut the fuck up, okay. You damn liar and fraud.

12 days ago

I want her to post the law that we are breaking. Laws are not word of mouth. They are legislated and documented. If we are breaking a law, "Uncle" Tom should post the law we are breaking right here in this thread..Smile

12 days ago

Ms. Tom is trying to evoke her white privilege by trying to throw her authoritative nature around...that`s what they do. I am quite sure she has so many pics of young underage black and white twinks loaded on her computer and phone. Not to mention her paying under aged boys for sex, she looks like the type and since she`s not attractive as she thought she was when she was younger and still posting those young aged pics of herself, Im sure she`s paying for sex by any means necessary. .


_________________





 
Post Posted: 12 days ago 
0
 
0
Track Thumbs Up/Down
Reply with quote

13 days ago

I thought all the Jackson children hated that old bastard?

Smile

13 days ago

Actually, that is a very typical white response. He is still their father and he supported them, raised them and helped to make them successful even though he may have been an overbearing asshole. They didn't come from privilege he helped bring them through.

13 days ago

Has nothing to do with being Black or White.

Has to do with being an abusive parent or not.

And 'ol Joe Jackson went way beyond abuse, according to the kids.

Don't shoot the messenger !

Smile

13 days ago

Again, another very white response. Deflect immediately, refuse to consider another POV, go tone deaf, insist your experience is the only valid one and assert that you know better.

13 days ago

But I did none of those things.


I simply stated the facts, that the Jackson kids accused their father of being abusive.

You can have different opinions about the relevance of that and the effects of it, but the fact that it happened is all I was saying.

Smile

You're lying. You offered an opinion based ENTIRELY upon your white cultural world view and now we are in an unnecessary extended discussion where you're failing at covering up that which was obvious. Everyone knows the Jackson family never said they hated Joe even though there were difficulties. That's your spin. Now admit you are wrong white boy and move it along.
 
Post Posted: 12 days ago 
2
 
0
Track Thumbs Up/Down
Reply with quote

13 days ago

I thought all the Jackson children hated that old bastard?

Smile

13 days ago

Actually, that is a very typical white response. He is still their father and he supported them, raised them and helped to make them successful even though he may have been an overbearing asshole. They didn't come from privilege he helped bring them through.

13 days ago

Has nothing to do with being Black or White.

Has to do with being an abusive parent or not.

And 'ol Joe Jackson went way beyond abuse, according to the kids.

Don't shoot the messenger !

Smile

13 days ago

Again, another very white response. Deflect immediately, refuse to consider another POV, go tone deaf, insist your experience is the only valid one and assert that you know better.

13 days ago

But I did none of those things.


I simply stated the facts, that the Jackson kids accused their father of being abusive.

You can have different opinions about the relevance of that and the effects of it, but the fact that it happened is all I was saying.

Smile

12 days ago

You're lying. You offered an opinion based ENTIRELY upon your white cultural world view and now we are in an unnecessary extended discussion where you're failing at covering up that which was obvious. Everyone knows the Jackson family never said they hated Joe even though there were difficulties. That's your spin. Now admit you are wrong white boy and move it along.

that's what he does...he flat out lies, never apologizes, and makes up things about himself to appear bigger/more important than he actually is...that's the type of behavior you see in a (abused) child...he won't even admit that his account was banned or that that's him in the pic...his behavior is disturbing
 
Post Posted: 12 days ago 
0
 
0
Track Thumbs Up/Down
Reply with quote

13 days ago

I thought all the Jackson children hated that old bastard?

Smile

13 days ago

Actually, that is a very typical white response. He is still their father and he supported them, raised them and helped to make them successful even though he may have been an overbearing asshole. They didn't come from privilege he helped bring them through.

13 days ago

Has nothing to do with being Black or White.

Has to do with being an abusive parent or not.

And 'ol Joe Jackson went way beyond abuse, according to the kids.

Don't shoot the messenger !

Smile

13 days ago

Again, another very white response. Deflect immediately, refuse to consider another POV, go tone deaf, insist your experience is the only valid one and assert that you know better.

13 days ago

But I did none of those things.


I simply stated the facts, that the Jackson kids accused their father of being abusive.

You can have different opinions about the relevance of that and the effects of it, but the fact that it happened is all I was saying.

Smile

12 days ago

You're lying. You offered an opinion based ENTIRELY upon your white cultural world view and now we are in an unnecessary extended discussion where you're failing at covering up that which was obvious. Everyone knows the Jackson family never said they hated Joe even though there were difficulties. That's your spin. Now admit you are wrong white boy and move it along.

https://nypost.com/2014/08/31/joe-jackson-is-cut-out-from-the-rest-of-his-family-insider/

Don't shoot the messenger, I'm just noting the news stories on this.

And don't come back with your tired "White privilege" line trying to dismiss this, it includes quotes from interviews with the actual family members, like any responsible journalism does.

When you act to dismiss the facts, despite them being right in your face, you are acting like a brain-dead Trump supporter.

Just saying...

Thanks !

Smile
 
Post Posted: 11 days ago 
1
 
0
Track Thumbs Up/Down
Reply with quote

13 days ago

I thought all the Jackson children hated that old bastard?

Smile

13 days ago

Actually, that is a very typical white response. He is still their father and he supported them, raised them and helped to make them successful even though he may have been an overbearing asshole. They didn't come from privilege he helped bring them through.

13 days ago

Has nothing to do with being Black or White.

Has to do with being an abusive parent or not.

And 'ol Joe Jackson went way beyond abuse, according to the kids.

Don't shoot the messenger !

Smile

13 days ago

Again, another very white response. Deflect immediately, refuse to consider another POV, go tone deaf, insist your experience is the only valid one and assert that you know better.

13 days ago

But I did none of those things.


I simply stated the facts, that the Jackson kids accused their father of being abusive.

You can have different opinions about the relevance of that and the effects of it, but the fact that it happened is all I was saying.

Smile

12 days ago

You're lying. You offered an opinion based ENTIRELY upon your white cultural world view and now we are in an unnecessary extended discussion where you're failing at covering up that which was obvious. Everyone knows the Jackson family never said they hated Joe even though there were difficulties. That's your spin. Now admit you are wrong white boy and move it along.

12 days ago

https://nypost.com/2014/08/31/joe-jackson-is-cut-out-from-the-rest-of-his-family-insider/

Don't shoot the messenger, I'm just noting the news stories on this.

And don't come back with your tired "White privilege" line trying to dismiss this, it includes quotes from interviews with the actual family members, like any responsible journalism does.

When you act to dismiss the facts, despite them being right in your face, you are acting like a brain-dead Trump supporter.

Just saying...

Thanks !

Smile

Thanks for showing your true colors once again! The New York Post is a biased, right wing fossip rag owned by Rupert Murdoch. I should have known that the likes of you would consider the New York Post reliable journalism..Smile
_________________

 
Post Posted: 11 days ago 
1
 
0
Track Thumbs Up/Down
Reply with quote

13 days ago

I thought all the Jackson children hated that old bastard?

Smile

13 days ago

Actually, that is a very typical white response. He is still their father and he supported them, raised them and helped to make them successful even though he may have been an overbearing asshole. They didn't come from privilege he helped bring them through.

13 days ago

Has nothing to do with being Black or White.

Has to do with being an abusive parent or not.

And 'ol Joe Jackson went way beyond abuse, according to the kids.

Don't shoot the messenger !

Smile

13 days ago

Again, another very white response. Deflect immediately, refuse to consider another POV, go tone deaf, insist your experience is the only valid one and assert that you know better.

13 days ago

But I did none of those things.


I simply stated the facts, that the Jackson kids accused their father of being abusive.

You can have different opinions about the relevance of that and the effects of it, but the fact that it happened is all I was saying.

Smile

12 days ago

You're lying. You offered an opinion based ENTIRELY upon your white cultural world view and now we are in an unnecessary extended discussion where you're failing at covering up that which was obvious. Everyone knows the Jackson family never said they hated Joe even though there were difficulties. That's your spin. Now admit you are wrong white boy and move it along.

12 days ago

https://nypost.com/2014/08/31/joe-jackson-is-cut-out-from-the-rest-of-his-family-insider/

Don't shoot the messenger, I'm just noting the news stories on this.

And don't come back with your tired "White privilege" line trying to dismiss this, it includes quotes from interviews with the actual family members, like any responsible journalism does.

When you act to dismiss the facts, despite them being right in your face, you are acting like a brain-dead Trump supporter.

Just saying...

Thanks !

Smile

11 days ago

Thanks for showing your true colors once again! The New York Post is a biased, right wing fossip rag owned by Rupert Murdoch. I should have known that the likes of you would consider the New York Post reliable journalism..Smile

gossip rag
_________________





 
Post Posted: 11 days ago 
0
 
0
Track Thumbs Up/Down
Reply with quote

13 days ago

I thought all the Jackson children hated that old bastard?

Smile

13 days ago

Actually, that is a very typical white response. He is still their father and he supported them, raised them and helped to make them successful even though he may have been an overbearing asshole. They didn't come from privilege he helped bring them through.

13 days ago

Has nothing to do with being Black or White.

Has to do with being an abusive parent or not.

And 'ol Joe Jackson went way beyond abuse, according to the kids.

Don't shoot the messenger !

Smile

13 days ago

Again, another very white response. Deflect immediately, refuse to consider another POV, go tone deaf, insist your experience is the only valid one and assert that you know better.

13 days ago

But I did none of those things.


I simply stated the facts, that the Jackson kids accused their father of being abusive.

You can have different opinions about the relevance of that and the effects of it, but the fact that it happened is all I was saying.

Smile

12 days ago

You're lying. You offered an opinion based ENTIRELY upon your white cultural world view and now we are in an unnecessary extended discussion where you're failing at covering up that which was obvious. Everyone knows the Jackson family never said they hated Joe even though there were difficulties. That's your spin. Now admit you are wrong white boy and move it along.

12 days ago

https://nypost.com/2014/08/31/joe-jackson-is-cut-out-from-the-rest-of-his-family-insider/

Don't shoot the messenger, I'm just noting the news stories on this.

And don't come back with your tired "White privilege" line trying to dismiss this, it includes quotes from interviews with the actual family members, like any responsible journalism does.

When you act to dismiss the facts, despite them being right in your face, you are acting like a brain-dead Trump supporter.

Just saying...

Thanks !

Smile

 
Post Posted: 11 days ago 
0
 
0
Track Thumbs Up/Down
Reply with quote

13 days ago

I thought all the Jackson children hated that old bastard?

Smile

13 days ago

Actually, that is a very typical white response. He is still their father and he supported them, raised them and helped to make them successful even though he may have been an overbearing asshole. They didn't come from privilege he helped bring them through.

13 days ago

Has nothing to do with being Black or White.

Has to do with being an abusive parent or not.

And 'ol Joe Jackson went way beyond abuse, according to the kids.

Don't shoot the messenger !

Smile

13 days ago

Again, another very white response. Deflect immediately, refuse to consider another POV, go tone deaf, insist your experience is the only valid one and assert that you know better.

13 days ago

But I did none of those things.


I simply stated the facts, that the Jackson kids accused their father of being abusive.

You can have different opinions about the relevance of that and the effects of it, but the fact that it happened is all I was saying.

Smile

12 days ago

You're lying. You offered an opinion based ENTIRELY upon your white cultural world view and now we are in an unnecessary extended discussion where you're failing at covering up that which was obvious. Everyone knows the Jackson family never said they hated Joe even though there were difficulties. That's your spin. Now admit you are wrong white boy and move it along.

12 days ago

https://nypost.com/2014/08/31/joe-jackson-is-cut-out-from-the-rest-of-his-family-insider/

Don't shoot the messenger, I'm just noting the news stories on this.

And don't come back with your tired "White privilege" line trying to dismiss this, it includes quotes from interviews with the actual family members, like any responsible journalism does.

When you act to dismiss the facts, despite them being right in your face, you are acting like a brain-dead Trump supporter.

Just saying...

Thanks !

Smile

11 days ago

More on this topic:

http://afropunk.com/2018/06/no-amount-of-success-is-worth-the-abuse-joe-jackson-inflicted-on-his-children/

Thanks !

Smile

That's an opinion piece from a blog. Try again..Smile
_________________

 
Post Posted: 11 days ago 
0
 
0
Track Thumbs Up/Down
Reply with quote

13 days ago

I thought all the Jackson children hated that old bastard?

Smile

13 days ago

Actually, that is a very typical white response. He is still their father and he supported them, raised them and helped to make them successful even though he may have been an overbearing asshole. They didn't come from privilege he helped bring them through.

13 days ago

Has nothing to do with being Black or White.

Has to do with being an abusive parent or not.

And 'ol Joe Jackson went way beyond abuse, according to the kids.

Don't shoot the messenger !

Smile

13 days ago

Again, another very white response. Deflect immediately, refuse to consider another POV, go tone deaf, insist your experience is the only valid one and assert that you know better.

13 days ago

But I did none of those things.


I simply stated the facts, that the Jackson kids accused their father of being abusive.

You can have different opinions about the relevance of that and the effects of it, but the fact that it happened is all I was saying.

Smile

12 days ago

You're lying. You offered an opinion based ENTIRELY upon your white cultural world view and now we are in an unnecessary extended discussion where you're failing at covering up that which was obvious. Everyone knows the Jackson family never said they hated Joe even though there were difficulties. That's your spin. Now admit you are wrong white boy and move it along.

12 days ago

https://nypost.com/2014/08/31/joe-jackson-is-cut-out-from-the-rest-of-his-family-insider/

Don't shoot the messenger, I'm just noting the news stories on this.

And don't come back with your tired "White privilege" line trying to dismiss this, it includes quotes from interviews with the actual family members, like any responsible journalism does.

When you act to dismiss the facts, despite them being right in your face, you are acting like a brain-dead Trump supporter.

Just saying...

Thanks !

Smile

no he didn't just say when you dismiss the facts when they're right there in your face.....smh. your account was banned - FACT! that pic is a pic of a much older you - FACT! FACTS, in your face, and you dismissed THEM. smh....tom, stop making a fool out of yourself...leave this thread alone...
 
Post Posted: 11 days ago 
0
 
0
Track Thumbs Up/Down
Reply with quote

13 days ago

I thought all the Jackson children hated that old bastard?

Smile

13 days ago

Actually, that is a very typical white response. He is still their father and he supported them, raised them and helped to make them successful even though he may have been an overbearing asshole. They didn't come from privilege he helped bring them through.

13 days ago

Has nothing to do with being Black or White.

Has to do with being an abusive parent or not.

And 'ol Joe Jackson went way beyond abuse, according to the kids.

Don't shoot the messenger !

Smile

13 days ago

Again, another very white response. Deflect immediately, refuse to consider another POV, go tone deaf, insist your experience is the only valid one and assert that you know better.

13 days ago

But I did none of those things.


I simply stated the facts, that the Jackson kids accused their father of being abusive.

You can have different opinions about the relevance of that and the effects of it, but the fact that it happened is all I was saying.

Smile

12 days ago

You're lying. You offered an opinion based ENTIRELY upon your white cultural world view and now we are in an unnecessary extended discussion where you're failing at covering up that which was obvious. Everyone knows the Jackson family never said they hated Joe even though there were difficulties. That's your spin. Now admit you are wrong white boy and move it along.

12 days ago

https://nypost.com/2014/08/31/joe-jackson-is-cut-out-from-the-rest-of-his-family-insider/

Don't shoot the messenger, I'm just noting the news stories on this.

And don't come back with your tired "White privilege" line trying to dismiss this, it includes quotes from interviews with the actual family members, like any responsible journalism does.

When you act to dismiss the facts, despite them being right in your face, you are acting like a brain-dead Trump supporter.

Just saying...

Thanks !

Smile

11 days ago

no he didn't just say when you dismiss the facts when they're right there in your face.....smh. your account was banned - FACT! that pic is a pic of a much older you - FACT! FACTS, in your face, and you dismissed THEM. smh....tom, stop making a fool out of yourself...leave this thread alone...

I have several, recent pics on my Profile, which anyone who cares to can see.

You choose to believe what someone posted and swallow it whole as your "truth".

Go ahead, it's your choice, but telling the same Lies over & over is NOT going to make them come true.

And yet you have NO pics on your own Profile ?

Why ?

How do you think this doesn't make you look like an idiot Troll ?

And you stupidly and feverishly re-posted a Link to the FB page of a little girl, here on a Gay Adult hook up site ?

All because you have some blind obsession with me, out of nowhere, and a prejudice & hatred towards White people ?

How does this not make you look Foolish and gullible ?

And then you admitted that you tried to CONTACT a little girl, sending here a Link back to a Gay Adult webite?

You have placed not only yourself but BGC in jeopardy, by disseminating a child's personal information on a Gay Adult website.

And then you state that you see nothing wrong with this?

Seriously ?

You can try to deflect and lie all you like, but you simply look like a gullible Fool to everyone on here.

Just the Facts...


Thanks !

Smile
 
Post Posted: 11 days ago 
0
 
0
Track Thumbs Up/Down
Reply with quote
@wht_sks_blk aka @whtsksblk aka @whtskksblk is at it again already! She just doesn't know how to cut her losses and let it go.

@wht_sks_blk wasn't your @whtsksblk profile banned by admin? Why is that????????? Admin hasn't banned any profiles in over a year, but they recently ban yours???????? Why??????????

And the @whtskksblk profile says HIV positive. @wht_sks_blk makes no mention of your HIV status. Is this yet another deception?????????
_________________

 
Post Posted: 11 days ago 
0
 
0
Track Thumbs Up/Down
Reply with quote

13 days ago

I thought all the Jackson children hated that old bastard?

Smile

13 days ago

Actually, that is a very typical white response. He is still their father and he supported them, raised them and helped to make them successful even though he may have been an overbearing asshole. They didn't come from privilege he helped bring them through.

13 days ago

Has nothing to do with being Black or White.

Has to do with being an abusive parent or not.

And 'ol Joe Jackson went way beyond abuse, according to the kids.

Don't shoot the messenger !

Smile

13 days ago

Again, another very white response. Deflect immediately, refuse to consider another POV, go tone deaf, insist your experience is the only valid one and assert that you know better.

13 days ago

But I did none of those things.


I simply stated the facts, that the Jackson kids accused their father of being abusive.

You can have different opinions about the relevance of that and the effects of it, but the fact that it happened is all I was saying.

Smile

12 days ago

You're lying. You offered an opinion based ENTIRELY upon your white cultural world view and now we are in an unnecessary extended discussion where you're failing at covering up that which was obvious. Everyone knows the Jackson family never said they hated Joe even though there were difficulties. That's your spin. Now admit you are wrong white boy and move it along.

12 days ago

https://nypost.com/2014/08/31/joe-jackson-is-cut-out-from-the-rest-of-his-family-insider/

Don't shoot the messenger, I'm just noting the news stories on this.

And don't come back with your tired "White privilege" line trying to dismiss this, it includes quotes from interviews with the actual family members, like any responsible journalism does.

When you act to dismiss the facts, despite them being right in your face, you are acting like a brain-dead Trump supporter.

Just saying...

Thanks !

Smile

11 days ago

no he didn't just say when you dismiss the facts when they're right there in your face.....smh. your account was banned - FACT! that pic is a pic of a much older you - FACT! FACTS, in your face, and you dismissed THEM. smh....tom, stop making a fool out of yourself...leave this thread alone...

11 days ago

I have several, recent pics on my Profile, which anyone who cares to can see.

You choose to believe what someone posted and swallow it whole as your "truth".

Go ahead, it's your choice, but telling the same Lies over & over is NOT going to make them come true.

And yet you have NO pics on your own Profile ?

Why ?

How do you think this doesn't make you look like an idiot Troll ?

And you stupidly and feverishly re-posted a Link to the FB page of a little girl, here on a Gay Adult hook up site ?

All because you have some blind obsession with me, out of nowhere, and a prejudice & hatred towards White people ?

How does this not make you look Foolish and gullible ?

And then you admitted that you tried to CONTACT a little girl, sending here a Link back to a Gay Adult webite?

You have placed not only yourself but BGC in jeopardy, by disseminating a child's personal information on a Gay Adult website.

And then you state that you see nothing wrong with this?

Seriously ?

You can try to deflect and lie all you like, but you simply look like a gullible Fool to everyone on here.

Just the Facts...


Thanks !

Smile

tom, shut up...smh...no one believe anything you say...
 
Post Posted: 11 days ago 
0
 
0
Track Thumbs Up/Down
Reply with quote

13 days ago

I thought all the Jackson children hated that old bastard?

Smile

13 days ago

Actually, that is a very typical white response. He is still their father and he supported them, raised them and helped to make them successful even though he may have been an overbearing asshole. They didn't come from privilege he helped bring them through.

13 days ago

Has nothing to do with being Black or White.

Has to do with being an abusive parent or not.

And 'ol Joe Jackson went way beyond abuse, according to the kids.

Don't shoot the messenger !

Smile

13 days ago

Again, another very white response. Deflect immediately, refuse to consider another POV, go tone deaf, insist your experience is the only valid one and assert that you know better.

13 days ago

But I did none of those things.


I simply stated the facts, that the Jackson kids accused their father of being abusive.

You can have different opinions about the relevance of that and the effects of it, but the fact that it happened is all I was saying.

Smile

12 days ago

You're lying. You offered an opinion based ENTIRELY upon your white cultural world view and now we are in an unnecessary extended discussion where you're failing at covering up that which was obvious. Everyone knows the Jackson family never said they hated Joe even though there were difficulties. That's your spin. Now admit you are wrong white boy and move it along.

12 days ago

https://nypost.com/2014/08/31/joe-jackson-is-cut-out-from-the-rest-of-his-family-insider/

Don't shoot the messenger, I'm just noting the news stories on this.

And don't come back with your tired "White privilege" line trying to dismiss this, it includes quotes from interviews with the actual family members, like any responsible journalism does.

When you act to dismiss the facts, despite them being right in your face, you are acting like a brain-dead Trump supporter.

Just saying...

Thanks !

Smile

11 days ago

no he didn't just say when you dismiss the facts when they're right there in your face.....smh. your account was banned - FACT! that pic is a pic of a much older you - FACT! FACTS, in your face, and you dismissed THEM. smh....tom, stop making a fool out of yourself...leave this thread alone...

11 days ago

I have several, recent pics on my Profile, which anyone who cares to can see.

You choose to believe what someone posted and swallow it whole as your "truth".

Go ahead, it's your choice, but telling the same Lies over & over is NOT going to make them come true.

And yet you have NO pics on your own Profile ?

Why ?

How do you think this doesn't make you look like an idiot Troll ?

And you stupidly and feverishly re-posted a Link to the FB page of a little girl, here on a Gay Adult hook up site ?

All because you have some blind obsession with me, out of nowhere, and a prejudice & hatred towards White people ?

How does this not make you look Foolish and gullible ?

And then you admitted that you tried to CONTACT a little girl, sending here a Link back to a Gay Adult webite?

You have placed not only yourself but BGC in jeopardy, by disseminating a child's personal information on a Gay Adult website.

And then you state that you see nothing wrong with this?

Seriously ?

You can try to deflect and lie all you like, but you simply look like a gullible Fool to everyone on here.

Just the Facts...


Thanks !

Smile



Is this picture of you more recent than the ones currently on your profile????????? Smile
_________________

 
Post Posted: 11 days ago 
0
 
0
Track Thumbs Up/Down
Reply with quote
He's still in here lying? LMAO! Call me a liar one more time, and I'ma post those ugly ass pics of when he was a kid. The one where everybody kept asking him "How old were you?" and he said "10."
 
Post Posted: 11 days ago 
0
 
0
Track Thumbs Up/Down
Reply with quote

13 days ago

He's still in here lying? LMAO! Call me a liar one more time, and I'ma post those ugly ass pics of when he was a kid. The one where everybody kept asking him "How are were you?" and he said "10."

please post it so i can use it as my default...
 
Post Posted: 11 days ago 
0
 
0
Track Thumbs Up/Down
Reply with quote
he's threatening bgc yall...i think we should prepare ourselves for another mass deletion lol
 
Post Posted: 11 days ago 
1
 
0
Track Thumbs Up/Down
Reply with quote

13 days ago

I thought all the Jackson children hated that old bastard?

Smile

13 days ago

Typical white response.

You and a whole lot of white people hear a rumor or a story and you run with it, even when it`s not true...every comment I have read about him being an old hateful, evil bastard, comes from the fonts of white people.

Yes, he whooped his kids asses when they got out of line because that`s what parents did back then, unlike today, which is why kids are as bad as fuck...and white parents, never beat their kids asses which is why they feel they can do and say what they want to anyone, with no consequences, WHITE PRIVILEGE.

So to break it down for you, in black households kids got their asses beat with a belt or switch. This was called corporal punishment, being held accountable for doing stupid shit, so when they go out in public they know how to act.

Joe Jackson, used corporal punishment because he had 10 kids most of them boys who would try him at some point, and his whole goal was to keep them out of jail, off of drugs and Joe and his wife, as well as Janet recently pointed out was the reason he ruled with an iron fist...they may not have known that then, especially the younger one`s Michael and LaToya who made comments to the press about him, because they were sensitive and easily manipulated...but later retracted their stories after understanding that what he did was for their benefit. Joe made amends with his children, the one`s that said he wronged them and that too was in the press, but you and other white people don`t want to read positive things or true things, you want to go through life believing that the first story is the actual story, just like you all believe MJ molested those boys and all of that was LIES and proven to be lies.

With that being said, you don`t know that man personally, you are judging him off of what you heard in the press. I`m sure you did not come from a perfect family and as OLD as you are, you should know better, but again, it`s that white people belief that if he`s black he did it, if he`s black he is guilty. His kids and grand kids love him and respect him. But I`m gonna let you white folks keep harboring your anger towards a man you don`t know in your black, evil hearts.

And side note: Since all you white people are calling Joe Jackson a horrible, evil, hateful man...try looking back at how hateful, evil horrible your ancestors where, again...to people you all don`t know...and for the record, his family loved him...his entire family










Bitch bye. Stick to posting porn. He beat those kids for missing notes, not playing correctly, when he was angry etc etc. And he blew most of Micheal money which he later reported. He never recanted the abuse asswipe, and if he needed a belt that bad why have 10 kids you can't feed unless you make them shuffle in front of some white folk. Nothing special about that. So much for his empire, his kids all had mixed race babies, and in another generation the Jackson's will be white and white looking with most of the money spent. A joke. And so is anyone else who thought Joe did anything great.
_________________
 
Post Posted: 11 days ago 
0
 
0
Track Thumbs Up/Down
Reply with quote

13 days ago

he's threatening bgc yall...i think we should prepare ourselves for another mass deletion lol

I didn't threaten BGC, you have, as did the person who initially posted the personal FB information of a child here on BGC, a Gay Adult website, which you and several others here then disseminated by re-posting it.

You then took it a step further by stating that you had actually contacted this child, and sent her a Link back to this Gay Adult website, and you encouraged others to do the same.

This violates several laws, and puts both yourself and BGC in jeopardy, legally.

If something happens as a result, it will be the fault of those involved in the posting & re-posting of a child's information on here, and I would expect BGC to take some action to protect themselves.

That is only common sense.

You were all too eager to jump in and join in the Trolling with these other messy Trolls.

Like the old saying goes, you lay down with dogs, you wake up with fleas.

Just the Facts....

Thanks !

Smile
 
Post Posted: 11 days ago 
0
 
0
Track Thumbs Up/Down
Reply with quote

13 days ago

he's threatening bgc yall...i think we should prepare ourselves for another mass deletion lol

11 days ago

I didn't threaten BGC, you have, as did the person who initially posted the personal FB information of a child here on BGC, a Gay Adult website, which you and several others here then disseminated by re-posting it.

You then took it a step further by stating that you had actually contacted this child, and sent her a Link back to this Gay Adult website, and you encouraged others to do the same.

This violates several laws, and puts both yourself and BGC in jeopardy, legally.

If something happens as a result, it will be the fault of those involved in the posting & re-posting of a child's information on here, and I would expect BGC to take some action to protect themselves.

That is only common sense.

You were all too eager to jump in and join in the Trolling with these other messy Trolls.

Like the old saying goes, you lay down with dogs, you wake up with fleas.

Just the Facts....

Thanks !

Smile

tom, stop repeating the same thing over and over...
 
Post Posted: 11 days ago 
0
 
0
Track Thumbs Up/Down
Reply with quote

13 days ago

he's threatening bgc yall...i think we should prepare ourselves for another mass deletion lol

11 days ago

I didn't threaten BGC, you have, as did the person who initially posted the personal FB information of a child here on BGC, a Gay Adult website, which you and several others here then disseminated by re-posting it.

You then took it a step further by stating that you had actually contacted this child, and sent her a Link back to this Gay Adult website, and you encouraged others to do the same.

This violates several laws, and puts both yourself and BGC in jeopardy, legally.

If something happens as a result, it will be the fault of those involved in the posting & re-posting of a child's information on here, and I would expect BGC to take some action to protect themselves.

That is only common sense.

You were all too eager to jump in and join in the Trolling with these other messy Trolls.

Like the old saying goes, you lay down with dogs, you wake up with fleas.

Just the Facts....

Thanks !

Smile

"Ms. Tom is trying to evoke her white privilege by trying to throw her authoritative nature around...that`s what they do. I am quite sure she has so many pics of young underage black and white twinks loaded on her computer and phone. Not to mention her paying under aged boys for sex, she looks like the type and since she`s not attractive as she thought she was when she was younger and still posting those young aged pics of herself, Im sure she`s paying for sex by any means necessary. ."
First Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Last Page 



 
   Forum Index -> All times are GMT
 
Page 4 of 8
Stop watching this topic
 
Jump to:   

You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You can edit your posts in this forum
You can delete your posts in this forum
You can vote in polls in this forum

 
Change Online Status: Status Update: